0
Shares
Pinterest Google+

More than 25 local residents attended a meeting of Gillingham Town Council this week to voice their anger over plans by South West Coaches to cut the bus route that serves Wyke and Peacemarsh.

The X2 service currently has stops in both parts of the town but the bus operator says these sections of the route are not sustainable financially.

They also claim that the Wyke and Peacemasrh sections have made the rest of the Gillingham, railway station and Shaftesbury service unreliable.

As a result South West Coaches are due to stop servicing Wyke and Peacemarsh in the coming weeks, possibly as soon as April.

However, residents who attended the full council meeting at the town hall on 24 February said that losing the service would be a major blow for people in those areas.

Resident Sharon Butler, who said she got involved in the issue after meeting local people who were deeply upset and ‘who broke down’ over the news, told councillors: ‘The residents who do use this service are mostly elderly, disabled, those with chronic illnesses ,or parents with small children. These are some of the most vulnerable people in our community and they rely on this service to take them from their homes to the shops in the High street, the chemist, the dentist, RiversMeet leisure centre, to the train station and to our two doctors surgeries, the Barn surgery and Peacemarsh health centre.’

She continued: ‘Many of the people who use and need this service are not mobile enough to even consider walking from Wyke or Peacemarsh to the centre of town. Many of them even struggle to walk to the bus stops but by doing so they get out of their homes and talk to other passengers, who may be the only people that they have spoken to for days. It’s vital for the mental health of these vulnerable residents to be able to do this, otherwise they are literally isolated in their own homes.

‘The only alternative transport that they have available to them is the use of taxis which is both expensive and often unavailable, due to being used as transport for children to and from school.’

Surrounded by fellow residents Sharon Butler added: ‘Gillingham Town Council must look into either subsidising this or providing alternative means of transport, perhaps using mini buses. We would urge the elected members of this council to take urgent action to ensure that the bus route continues to be available to some of the most vulnerable members of their constituencies.’

The residents rejected claims by South West Coaches that only six people use the coaches regularly; around 15 told councillors they often used the service.

Councillor Rupert Evill said he had not known such strength of feeling over a public transport issue in the town, describing the reaction of local people as ‘exceptional’.

Mayor Barry Von Clemens said that though the town council has no statutory role in transport issues he promised that the council would represent the ‘voice’ of local residents to Dorset Travel, part of Dorset Council, who are responsible for transport issues.

Councillors voted unanimously to write to Dorset Council pointing out the strength of feeling over the issue and the need for residents of Wyke and Peacemarsh to have a bus service.

Councillor Val Pothecary, who is a member of both the town council and Dorset Council also promised to look into the matter.

Meanwhile another local Dorset councillor, Councillor Belinda Ridout, has said she is to look at an alternative service.

She told Gillingham News: ‘ I personally see it as an opportunity to put in place a far more efficient and climate friendly service. An initial proposal is for community transport to pick up the unmet need, with a circular route for access to main facilities in the town, encompassing outlying villages which would otherwise be isolated.

‘I will be attending meetings over the coming weeks with Dorset Travel, Councillor Derek Beer – Dorset’s Public Transport Champion – and transport providers to work up a plan.’

Previous post

Police make witness appeal after thefts in Gillingham

Next post

Police issue CCTV appeal after theft from shop in Shaftesbury

4 Comments

  1. Sally Beaton
    27 February 2020 at 11:20 am — Reply

    Great to hear how actively our council are getting involved with this urgent need.

  2. Linda Tapsell
    27 February 2020 at 1:44 pm — Reply

    Yesterday while waiting for the bus to come back to Common Mead Lane i spoke to 3 people who had no idea of this, they do not have the internet and had heard no rumours, If this service is not viable then why not start charging fares,One lady said she would happily pay rather than use her bus pass if it meant keeping the bus,It is absolutely ridiculous to stop the buses,

  3. sally d
    2 March 2020 at 5:42 pm — Reply

    This is not consultation!

    My aged mother who lives independently in the Peacemarsh area is a regular and frequent user of the bus service. She was told about the consultation after the event by a bus driver – so she was unable to attend the meeting which she would have done. She actively campaigned last time this route was under threat.
    Councils and health providers go on about people being supported in independent living, mental health and well being and involvement in the community – without this bus route my mothers independence is absolutely curtailed: she will not be able to get up to Shaftsbury unless she gets to the station first ( although she may be able to get back); she will have to walk to and from Waitrose and the town where she shops; she will not be able to maintain her network of friends unless someone gives her a lift etc. This is so wrong and I am both concerned and angry,

  4. Helen Nicholls
    25 June 2020 at 8:26 pm — Reply

    I have recently been widowed and spend most days weeping my eyes out at the loss of my beloved husband of 63 years. If this issue is not solved, I can see me starving myself to death or ending my life soon in some other fashion. It is the most cruel decision any council could possibly impose on old people. It is Very well known that the Wyke area of Gillingham is predominantly inhabited by the elderly and infirm, so how could they even consider such a move?

Leave a reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *